James and the Giant Corn Genetics: Studying the Source Code of Nature

October 13, 2009

Potato Genome!

Filed under: biology,Plants,research stories — Tags: , , , , , — James @ 7:26 pm
4000695954_3feb96f136_m
Photo from graibeard

Sort of anyway. What was released was a pre-publication scaffold of the genome. A final, published, version might include more primary sequence data, will have fewer gaps, and most importantly of all, people will be able publish their own work which draws on the potato genome.

Overall I have mixed feelings on the current practice of releasing genome sequences prior to publication. As someone who does comparative genomics, having access to more genomes is great, but the agreements they’re released under severely limit how they can be used in publications prior to the publication of the genome paper itself (which can be a LONG time).

Within the grasses four genomes are available (Maize(corn), Sorghum, Rice and Brachypodium) however only two of them, Rice and Sorghum, are published. Any paper making use of whole genome analysis of all four cannot be published before the Maize and Brachy papers come out (hopefully before the end of this year!).

That said having even a rough draft of the potato genome is cool. Potato is a great plant for a lot of reasons. Potatoes are the fourth staple crop (behind only rice, maize and wheat) that provided enough food for people to build civilizations and probably the most important non-grass crop in the world. Currently there are no GMO-potatoes on the market, as I mentioned here. Domesticated potatoes are tetraploid and rarely breed true (their offspring aren’t much like the parents).* And I still owe it a post of its own.

Another reason to be interested in potatoes are is the family tree of the species. Potato can claim tomatoes, eggplant, and deadly nightshade as close relatives.** That whole group of species belongs to a different branch of the family tree of plants (the Asterids) from the early non-grass genomes (Arabidopsis, Papaya, and Grape) which were all in a group called the Rosids. These two groups are responsible for a lot of the diversity of species within the Eudicots*** so it’s good we are starting to starting to see Asterid genomes.

*Potatoes grown from seed not sharing many characteristics with their parents is why most cultivation of potatoes is done by planting pieces of potatoes instead of seed. The plant that sprouts out of a potato is genetically identical to the plant that grew the potato. It’s a clone. Apples actually face a similar issue with apple seeds not being much like their parents. That’s why breeds of apples are propagated by grafting. A breeder cuts off a piece of a branch from one tree and carefully connects it to the stem of an unrelated apple tree. If the graft is done properly the branch will grow, flower, and produce fruit just as it would normally. So all apples of the same variety (say Gala, Macintosh, or my new favorite Cripps Pink) are clones of each other.

**The obvious family resemblance to deadly nightshade was one of the reasons Europeans originally believed tomatoes and potatoes to be toxic when they were introduced from the Americas.

***For a sense of how Eudicots fit into the family tree of all plants, check out Phylogeny of Pineapple, a further explanation of awesomeness

October 12, 2009

Could someone check my math?

Filed under: Feeding the world,Fun With Numbers — James @ 9:33 pm
Deliciousness

Deliciousness

Per capita meat consumption in America is 124.8 kilos per year. Which is ~275 pounds per year, 5.3 pounds per week, and almost exactly 3/4 of a pound per day.

That seems like a lot to me. I mean that’s three quarter-pound hamburgers each and every day. On occasion I’ve hit twice that, maybe thrice in a single meal. But when I say on occasion, I mean every once in a long while. I can’t believe the occasional, delicious, burger binge would bring my average up to three quarters of a pound on a per-day basis.

Have I made an obvious math error? Am I eating less like the average American than I realize? Anyone have more insight into this statistic?

Internet Scale Data

Filed under: Computers and Coding — James @ 9:12 am

I’m pretty proud of my eight core* workstation. But then I picked up the New York Times this morning** and found out I’m in fact behind the times:

For the most part, university students have used rather modest computing systems to support their studies. They are learning to collect and manipulate information on personal computers or what are known as clusters, where computer servers are cabled together to form a larger computer. But even these machines fail to churn through enough data to really challenge and train a young mind meant to ponder the mega-scale problems of tomorrow.

“If they imprint on these small systems, that becomes their frame of reference and what they’re always thinking about.”

Analyzing huge data sets is only going to get more important in the future, especially in biology. (more…)

October 11, 2009

Snow on Corn

Filed under: Link Posts — Tags: , , , — James @ 3:41 am

Speaking of strange weather: Check out the first photo of the latest post on Plants are the Strangest People. I’m not used to seeing corn getting snowed on until the plants have already turned brown. But that’s exactly what happened in Iowa.

This will be my second winter without snow (except visits to see family in the rest of the country). It feels very unnatural. Hope I still remember how to drive in it (and shovel it) once I leave Berkeley.

Note that it’s 3:40 AM in the west coast. My weekend of decompression and vegetation is going well.

October 10, 2009

Really Strange Looking Clouds

Filed under: Link Posts — Tags: , , — James @ 11:25 pm

It looks like something photoshopped but apparently not, a whole new class of clouds created by ripples between different layers of air in the sky. Like the the dust storm in sydney, real weather can be strange enough to look like something out of a movie with modern CGI.

One question I have from the write up:

In hill country from Iowa to the Scottish Highlands…

Where is this Iowan hill country?

October 9, 2009

How viable is local food?

Filed under: agriculture,Fun With Numbers — James @ 7:21 pm

Before I begin, let me say there’s absolutely nothing wrong with supporting your local farmers through CSAs, farmers markets, or direct purchases. I’ve done similar things before and it makes sense in the same way I’d prefer to support local businesses over national chains It keeps money in the local economy and even if it didn’t, it is always more fun cheering for the home team.*

That said how viable is solely local food (usually with an arbitrary cut off of 30 or 50, or even 100 miles from its point of origin) for providing all the food for all the residents a major city? (more…)

October 8, 2009

Superweeds

Filed under: agriculture,biology — James @ 5:46 pm

I’m sure everyone reading this has heard the term ‘superweed.’ These are the terrible new creations that will, or in some cases have, been created by herbicide resistant crops. What makes them so super and terrible? They’re resistant to the same herbicide as the herbicide resistant crop they grow among. Treating crops with herbicides selects for herbicide resistance crops in the same way treating infections with antibiotics selects for antibiotic resistant bacteria. Taking antibiotic drugs kills all the bacteria susceptible to the antibiotic. That means any individual bacterium which can survive the treatment is much more likely to reproduce and thrive now that all its competitors were killed by the drug. In the same way, spraying fields with an herbicide, while good at killing off weeds, also gives a big selective advantage to any weeds that carry traits which allow them to survive the spray. Thusly are the superweeds born. Why isn’t that the end of the world? Read on the find out.

(more…)

October 7, 2009

Vilsack in the News Again

Filed under: agriculture,Politics — James @ 10:02 pm

This time for being the force behind a program to provide the equipment for farmers markets to accept food stamps, something that everyone should agree is a good thing. People have access to cheaper*, healthier food, farmers take home more money themselves. This comes on top of the increases in the money provided for the food stamps program (which was both long overdue and, along with increasing unemployment benefits, has been shown as one of the most efficient ways to stimulate the economy) as well as experiments at some farmers markets to redeem food stamps at twice face value. Keeping in mind actual stamps were replaced by EBT cards years ago.

Up until now the problem has been that the “food stamps” program switched to an electronic swipe card system some years ago which require a swipe reader. No problem at a grocery store where a single checkout lane can easily do five-figures of sales in a single day, but purchasing the readers (which also require internet access to function) is a major finacial burden for individual farmers, who, if they’re doing well, are making one or two thousand dollars one day each week at farmers markets. (more…)

Bike Repair is Hard

Filed under: Uncategorized — James @ 8:32 pm

Who knew the different between a crank pull and a crank puller would be so big.

October 6, 2009

Practice Talk

Filed under: biology,Campus Life — James @ 7:05 pm

For my teaching assistant training class we have to give half hour presentations. I just finished mine and I’m SO glad I held my own against the person who went before me. He had the advantage of talking about ecology, which usually is better at engaging the audience, and has a polished powerpoint presentation. My talk was basically an expanded version of Phylogeny of Pineapple, a further explanation of awesomeness.

People seemed genuinely engaged and the feedback after the talk was positive. Whenever phylogeny and genomics can go up against biodiversity and ecosystem services, and not be humiliatingly crushed is a victory for all of us.

No offense to ecologists, you guy do exciting research and I love getting the chance to sit in on your talks, it’s just nice when we plant biologists can get attention too.

« Newer PostsOlder Posts »

Powered by WordPress